Inception Review

So, I saw the trailer for Inception and decided, not for me, just another of Leonardo DiCaprio’s weird movies. But my brother said I would like it and he was right. I did like it, in fact, I think it the best grownup movie of the summer.

Inception’s premise is that you can share dreams with other people and, if you do it right, you can find out their secrets. You can create mazes and levels in the dreams, you can infiltrate and observe, you can uncover secrets and, if you really do it right, you can plant ideas. Inception is also the story of a man fighting himself, it is a story of theft and infiltration, it is a story of wanting to change things, of wanting to go back, of wanting to live in a better world, and of blurring reality and fantasy.

The Good: As a film, it was amazing. Every moment I was riveted, every moment I was interested (maybe not always in Leo DiCaprio’s part of the story, but in some part of the movie), the twists and turns and reveals were all very good. (Yes, I did guess a couple, but it was an original story). Everything about the movie, as a film, was very good. The acting was superb, maybe because they felt real and the personalities on screen were not about actors, but about characters. As a film, it was amazing and well worth watching.

However, as for moral issues, you can’t say it is a really good one. The characters in Inception are really just thieves with a super cool way of getting in, they steal, they lie, they break the law. But there are moral issues dealt with in the movie. The movie deals with guilt, with the past, with pain, with loss, with living in the real world, not a movie, game, or dream. The movie deals with the fact that we make mistakes, that we can’t go back, that reality (though not perfect and often a let down) is better for us than anything else. Reality may not be as fun or as amazing, but nowhere else do we really feel complete. A dream maybe wonderful while we are in it, but when we wake up, it was just a dream and we realize that life is far better than it ever could be.

The Moral: The whole idea of inception is to go into someone’s mind – through their dreams – and alter their mental state, either by taking something or by leaving something. So we all know what happens when you take something that is not your own, you’ve stolen something. The 8th commandment says that stealing is wrong, so, clearly, when they enter anyone’s mind and remove something, they’ve violated God’s moral code.

However, as terrible as it is to take something – especially something from someone’s mind – I found the idea of planting something in someone’s mind as even worse. The idea that someone could enter my own personal thoughts and take something out of them is quite terrifying, but what if they could put something there. What if they could put something in, a thought that keeps growing, a thought that takes over, a thought I can’t get rid of or control. Ideas are dangerous, but how much more dangerous if it is not my idea?

The trouble I had with Inception was not so much the stealing, that I know is wrong and so did they, but it the planting of the idea raised the real questions. The planting of an idea, the entering my mind and putting something in there was what was really terrifying. They don’t deal with the right and wrong with stealing, because it is obviously wrong, but their inability to identify inception’s morality was really terrifying. You could plant an idea that could be good, but what if it turns bad? What if your entrance into a mind changes it? What if the mind is never the same? Is it wrong? What if it is better for them in the long run or you think it will be better for them? What if it is the only way or the best way? Is just putting something in a mind wrong?

Think of it like this: what if I were a burglar, but instead of taking, I left something? What if I left you a puppy, instead of stealing your TV. What if I left you a cute, cuddly little puppy? I know you are lonely and sad and this puppy is cute and sweet. You’ll love him and he’ll love you. What could be better? But what happens when that puppy grows? What happens if you can’t control that puppy? What happens if turns into a 200 pound Mastiff that destroys all your furniture? What happens if it bites your children? What happens if it bites you? What if it is the best thing that ever happened to you or what if it is the worst? Do you see the problem?

Inception is not scary because people could find your secrets, Inception is scary because people could plant an idea in your head, an idea you always thought was your own, an idea that could change your life and the lives of everyone around you. The most dangerous thing in the world is an idea. It has always been so, an idea led to the first sin, an idea led to the rising and falling of empires, an idea led to this movie and my review. Ideas have consequences. So, where does that leave us morally? Is it right, is it wrong? Does it just depend upon your intent? Ideas are also very, very dangerous. Do we understand just how dangerous?

Another moral issue is death. To wake from a dream you either die or you fall. So, to get out of the dream those in it either needed to die or to fall. So, there was a lot of both. Someone said it was pro-suicide. However, I didn’t find it so – in fact, there were plenty of times when death was a bad idea – but you should be warned.

The film also dealt with losing sight of reality in a dream world. With video games, angsty vampire novels, and Internet forums where you can be anyone and anything, fantasy and reality can become blurred. This film shows the importance of keeping them separate, of knowing what is fake and what is real and never, never, never losing sight of the truth.

The Ugly: Honestly, I don’t really remember anything that would fit under this category. There was mild-ish swearing and mention was made of a man’s infidelity. (Warning, this movie does deal with a man and his wife, so there is kissing and cuddling and that sort of thing, but nothing inappropriate, just mushy.)

The Conclusion: I enjoyed Inception, not just because it was a good film, but also because it left me with questions, with (dare I say?) ideas. It left me thinking. Now, to be fair, not everyone left thinking, certainly not the people who invaded another’s mind, but I was left thinking. I was left pondering the film, wondering about it, questioning actions and my response to them. I was also left convinced that the film was pro real life. With so much escapism, this film – to me – was about finding what was real and clinging to it. This film was also about moving on, about forgiving yourself, about making the best of the here and now, because it won’t ever come again. This film is about life, about the fact that we only have so much and we must make the most of it, now. We can dream all we want, but one day we will wake up and will have to face reality and that reality is what we’ve made of it.

 

Knight & Day Review

A spy (Roy), who has apparently gone rouge, ends up on a plane with a regular, harried woman (June) on her way to her sister’s wedding. And the plane ride doesn’t go as planned, meaning that the government isn’t just out to get the spy, but her as well.

The Good: Where to begin? This movie is really just a summer, pop-corn, action/romance/date movie, there isn’t any real substance, but it is a nice, light fun movie. The man is shown to protect and care for without having to possess or rule (unlike a recent main character in another popular film). Chasing dreams, although perhaps not always laudable, is emphasized, but chasing those dreams is shown to be even better with the ones that you love. Doing the right thing is encouraged, however, breaking the rules is also ok, if the motives or ends are right.

The Bad: The movie was light and fluffy. The action was pretty good, the romance…not being a huge romance fan, I’m not really sure how to rank it. I think it was an ok romance, pretty moral at least. The movie was slightly boring in parts, especially the beginning, I found myself wishing for a more M0ission Impossible fare. The character development was limited and I didn’t understand some of the actions by the characters. There were also some definite blonde moments that got on my nerves. I want a woman to be a woman, but she doesn’t have to be a ditz.

The Ugly: Hmm… There was cussing, not a bunch but at least one very, very strong word. June wears a bikini and then wants to know how she got into it. Quite a bit of kissing. The World-view: Was there one? I’m not really sure. It was very light and fluffy. Not a great movie, but good pop-corn fare. I was bored a couple of times, didn’t really care about the protagonists or the antagonists, thought the fight scenes a little limited, and there was nothing in the movie that really stood out (except June’s eyes, I think they had to be digitally enhanced or something.) It was a forgettable, but enjoyable movie. However I was quite upset by June’s cussing. The film lauds protection and care for loved ones and innocents, however, Roy has no problem shooting random government agents (whether they die or not is left unresolved). Breaking the rules, if it means doing the right thing, is considered acceptable. I’m not going to say that you shouldn’t do the right thing, but it did seem that breaking the rules was really the fun part.

The Conclusion: If you want to watch something light and fun, this is probably an ok choice. However, fast-forward through June talking about a warning and you should be fine. Brilliant? No. Memorable? No. Popcorn fare? Yes.

 

Faramir and Eowyn

My favorite love story in The Lord of the Rings

The Captain and The White Lady

The Captain and The White Lady

 

Robin Hood Review

So, I heard both good and bad things about this movie.  Someone said that you know it is bad when it takes 2 and 1/2 hours for the legend to “begin”.  I must also confess that my favorite Robin Hood is the animated Disney movie and I doubt that Russell Crowe could ever beat the handsome fox for Robin Hood.  The movie was not great, if you are willing to look past its flaws and not expect the merry men, the gallivanting, the robbing, the dodging the law, and a hero that laughs, then you are going to be ok.

The Good:  Robin is a hero to be admired and liked, even if he is a bit serious all of the time.  Marion takes care of her husband’s lands and people in his absence and is not afraid to get her hands dirty.  Their love story in this film – and there is one – I didn’t mind too much, but it is more than I expected from an action flick.  It was kind of sweet, but I did wish for more Robin Hood and his merry band and less of the other things – more later.  The final action sequence – except Marion’s involvement – was very striking and quite good.  The cinematography and the music were very good.  The film as a whole, was visually striking and not badly done….  However…

The Bad:  The plot was very complex and bogged down.  It was as if they couldn’t decide whether to make a political thriller or a just plain action flick so they combined them and the result was…less than ideal.  The plot was complex and I ended up not really caring about the other characters or what happened to John, I really just wanted to see Robin Hood!  For a film named for him, he didn’t really get as much focus as you would have thought.  Robin’s big, stirring speech left me incredulous.  Yes, I love my liberty, but the words seemed more fitting coming from the mouths of Patrick Henry or Samuel Adams or other such patriots, not Robin Hood.  The film also had several cliches that could easily have been done away with, there is a “I am your father!” type scene, the screaming “NO!” and running in slow motion, the rousing speech that makes all the difference…  Some of the characters were quite underdeveloped, King John’s actions were a little difficult to understand, perhaps intentionally so, but I still struggled with his character.  The sheriff – unfortunately played by Matthew Macfayden – fluctuated between bumbling and calculating.

The Ugly:  Where to begin?  First, the film is very, very dirty.  I mean disgusting dirty.  I am sure that the 12th century probably was this dirty, but I felt that if they’d payed as much attention to Robin Hood as they did the filth and grime, the movie would have been better.  Robin’s “merry” band is code for drunk and promiscuous and the village women are no better.   King John’s adultery is quite visibly dealt with and he stands apparently unclothed with his back to the camera – how much do you see?  I have no idea.  I covered my eyes.  There must have been innuendos, but I didn’t understand them.  There was some limited cursing.  Of course, Christianity took a bit of a beating, but not more than the usual Hollywood fare.  And the church was shown to be corrupt, but that was probably historically accurate.  Marion’s virtue is attacked twice by two different men and mention is made of her short life with her husband.

The Feminist:  Well, I went in vowing that I could not, would not like Marion.  However, I did rather like her.  Yes, her ability to string and use a long bow was a little silly, but for the most part I liked her.  She tried so hard to make the land go and to keep her people fed and protected from the local despots of the church and sheriff.  However, despite her best attempts she cannot succeed and then Robin shows up and in a day manages to do more than she had done in years.  I liked that Robin led and she followed.  I liked that she wasn’t a weakling, but was no man either.  She mourned the loss of those she loved and when she killed a man, it was very difficult.  And then it all went bad.  At the big battle a black knight leading a band of riders appeared and I thought, “It must be Richard, for he does return!”  I was so very excited and then it was Marion.  On a horse, wearing armor that probably weighed at least 50 to 100 pounds leading children (literally) armed with spears (with wooden tips) against a trained, mailed, army.  *sigh*  I suppose, however, it should be said that she was more trouble in the battle than she was help, which should in some small way make up for her feminism.  But I could not forgive her for being willing to lead boys to a slaughter.

The Conclusion:  If the movie had been trimmed a little, lost some of the detailed plots, not had Robin turn into Patrick Henry, removed the mail from Marion, focused more on Robin Hood and his merry men, and thrown in a little more humor it would have been unstoppable.  Or if the movie had taken the political intrigue to its full extent and dropped the title Robin Hood, it would have been a pretty good historical intrigue film.   The action sequences were good, the acting – if a trifle serious – was good, the music very good, the film visually enjoyable – save all the dirt and filth that must needs be shown in every shot.  However, the movie never seemed to make up its mind, should it be serious or light, an action/adventure movie or a political thriller, should it focus on the common man or the royalty, should it be the next Pirates of the Caribbean on land or the next Patriot/Gladiator?

I would see the movie again, however I would carry the remote and fast-forward through the political scenes.  I went to Robin Hood to see Robin Hood, I went for a man doing his best to care for those around him, a movie of adventure and action and humor and I got only a very little of that.

 

Iron Man II Review

I went into Iron Man 2 caught between a fear of Scarlett Johansson and a fondness for Iron Man.  I had heard that it wasn’t as good as the first Iron Man and I must agree.

The Good:  I liked the movie on the whole.  There were positive themes, I liked the hero better than before.  I also liked the Air Force guy much better than the last movie.  The action sequences and special effects were very good – if a bit few, more on that later.  I found the movie rather funny, but the humor wasn’t quite as common as I would have liked.  The movie featured far less information about Tony Stark’s moral problems and more about him coming to terms with himself.

The Bad:  The movie lagged in the middle, there was almost a superfluous villain, Pepper’s five minutes of screaming got on my nerves, I disliked the fact that the Hammer character got so much screen time.  (I came to see Iron Man, not some random rich CEO blabbering on and on and on!  Come on!  More Iron Man, if you please.)  I detested the “Black Widow” character, but thankfully, her screen time was a little limited.  The action sequences were a little sparse for a movie that claimed to be in the action/super hero genre.

The Ugly:  A woman partially undresses in a car.  *sigh*  Was it really necessary?  No.  There were said to be innuendos, but I either didn’t hear them or didn’t understand them.  Tony Stark’s immorality is still present, if subdued.  The Iron Man dancers, for lack of a better word, featured little clothes and quite a bit of screen time.  I don’t recall any profanity, but if it existed, it was limited.

Conclusion:  I would watch it again – not in theaters – if only to remind me to go watch the first Iron Man or to tide me over until the third one.  It was by no means a horrid movie, but it was a little slow and didn’t focus quite enough on the character we all really cared about.

 

LotR Banners…

So, I watched The Lord of the Rings again and I discovered that I still love those movies.   Yes, there are many flaws and, yes, there are many things I do not like about them.  However, I do still love them, despite the flaws.  So, I was ill and bored created these:

Even Elves Laugh

Even Elves Laugh

Eowyn's Life Banner

Eowyn's Life Banner

Yes, they are rather similar, but somehow it was the only way to make them sort of work…  Anyways, the Eowyn banner took me ages and I still don’t really like it.  But the Galadriel banner was immediately finished and I’m not sure that I like it.  I don’t know.  Anyway, I just wanted to share my rediscovered love for The Lord of the Rings with you.  Go read the books or watch the movies or both!

 

A Flawed Knight…

Oh, knight, how shiny is your armor,
You are so much handsomer than a farmer,
Unless of course you remove your helm,
Then your beauty only rivals an old elm.

Your shield bears a noble crest,
By its beauty I am impressed,
But it is dented and battered,
Ill repair has left it almost shattered.

Your cape is beautiful to the eye,
The wind does make it fly,
Your heels kick it high,
My love for it I cannot deny!

You sword is quite impressive,
That much I will give.
However, your wielding,
Does show it unyielding.

It’s heaviness is very great,
Your arms cannot it always rate.
Your swings are wild and hard put,
You all but remove your foot!

The shining armor does enthrall,
But your stature is rather small,
The armor’s clinking alerts all,
And you almost walk into a wall!

Ah, but your might steed!
Your case he does plead.
A steed so mighty and so strong,
He does stand out from the throng,

But your mastery is not complete,
For your will you must compete.
But as the tournament nears,
Away run all my fears.

Your horse aligns,
Your banner climbs,
Your armor shines,
Your helm inclines.

My colors to you I toss,
Your weaknesses loss’d,
Perhaps it is the armor’s glint,
That banishes the doubtful hints.

Whatever the cause of this weakness,
My love for knights I do confess.
The armor, capes, swords,
Lances, helms, gauntlets all affords,

A man of great might,
Who always walks in light,
And never strays from the right,
To a lady, ever polite.

Oh, Sir Knight, for me do win,
This contest and then,
Your valor I will reward,
With a smile, a kiss, and kind word!

Your weaknesses and flaws,
Are far displaced by your abiding laws,
To chivalry, country, and God,
Your goodness I see, though you are flawed.

~

(I don’t think this quite turned out the way I wanted.  I had planned on it being fully humorous and now I wonder if the humor is ill placed.  Perhaps I will change it, but until then, I post it for your enjoyment or critique or both.)

 

Revenge! (A Halo Reach Poem)

Holding the controller, waiting,
The countdown starts,
My hands are shaking,
Pick my class from the charts.

Wait for the spawn,
The tension ups,
The silence wears upon,
Then suddenly gunfire erupts.

I run for cover,
Waiting, fingers tensed,
Inside the door I hover,
Maybe he hasn’t sensed.

Just inside I wait,
“Come on, come on,
Walk through the gate.”
My score will hinge upon,

His walking into me.
First person turns to third,
Then suddenly,
My sight is blurred.

Assassinate.
But I am for revenge,
And it does fascinate,
My death I will avenge.

I spawn again,
See his red dot,
I will end his reign,
I run to the spot.

The fight is tense,
“Close call!”
But it is my offense,
I leave walking tall.

 

A Poem for Mom

Smart, kind, witty, wise,
All these words help me realize,
My Mother is a wonderful gift,
The perfect woman God picked,
To be the Mother I need,
A counselor I should heed.

My mother is not flawless,
Sometimes she may be a mess,
But when it comes down to it,
I love her more than a little bit,
My mother has been sent to me,
Just the way she needs to be.

Thank you Mother for your time,
Your work, your care, your love sublime,
Thank you for teaching, training, scolding,
Laughing, caring, loving, holding,
Without you my life would be incomplete
So my thanks I repeat.

Thank you for my Mother, Lord,
We are all with one accord,
Without our mothers, we’d be lost,
Over the seas of life tossed,
But them you sent to help us,
And our great thanks – to you and them – we confess.

(A poet, I am not!)

 

Recipes…

So, I might be physically incapable of not modifying a recipe. Yes, I know, I know, you should always try it just the way it is the first time and then make adjustments the next time. But here is my concern: What if it tastes bad enough the first time that I don’t want to make it a second time? What then? But despite my fears, I always decide that I will follow the recipe right straight through without alterations…and then I don’t. I add a little bit more or a little something different, not a lot mind you, just a little. And then – provided I like it – I go all out the next time. I through things in, toss things out, add more or less or something entirely different. And most of the time, it turns out pretty good and I’m glad. I took something that was a plain, boring recipe and made it my own! Am I not amazing? Doesn’t that sound important and enlightened.

Then someone asks for my recipe. Do you know how presumptuous it sounds to say, “Oh, I use my own recipe.” like I’m Martha Stewart or something! “I would share it with you Plebeian, but you wouldn’t understand. You have to have that sense, that knowledge that you have added just the right amount of everything, otherwise it will never turn out properly. And since you are not me and do not watch Food Network every spare minute, you cannot have that ability and your creation is doomed to failure!” (Because, let’s be honest, that’s what people hear when you say, I add flour until it…looks right… Or that I add two teaspoons of vanilla and a splosh extra? Or I beat it until it is the right color and texture and then I add…)

So, you are standing there trying to decide how to tell them your recipe, without sounding presumptuous, condescending, or incapable of following a recipe. Usually, I end up stating the regular recipe and mumble something about adding a little extra of this or that and hope that if it flops they blame it on bad eggs.